Limited

Federal

Government

 

by

Forest Glen Durland

 

 

8th Edition

May 9, 2004

Computer File = govsmall.sxw

 Internet file - govsmall.htm


 

God Bless America
Old Glory Flying Proudly
We Shall Defend

 

 

 


Limited

Federal

Government

 

Defending Person and Property

from

Unconstitutional Government

 

with excerpts from Constitutions

to provide documented solutions.

 

by

Forest Glen Durland

 

 

8th Edition

May 20, 2003

 

Copyright 2001, 2003 by Forest Glen Durland

14675 1/2 Big Basin Way, Saratoga, CA 95070-6081


Prologue

When two 9th Circuit judges closed the Headgates in Klamath Falls, Oregon in 2001, they violated the Constitution to the point of treason.

The facts are simple and final:

 

Therefore:

 

Winning action dictates:

The above reasoning applies to state laws and agencies that are based in any way upon unconstitutional federal agencies or laws. They are without power to enforce and states must be held liable.

Following the implementation of this stand, the same action must taken nationally in an effort to save our Constitutional Republic from total destruction.

It is a national disaster that very few attorneys comprehend the Constitution and the basic stand taken by this thesis.

In the overall scenario we see unconstitutional acts being done using public tax dollars.

In the total picture emerges a gnawing question: Why? And who?

This disastrous chain of events must be stopped. The first road block could be placed in the Klamath Basin. In fact, it is highly probable that so go the the farmers in the Klamath Basin, so goes America. This is not a fight to lose.

On the shoulders of those two 9th Circuit judges rests the future of America. But instead of honoring their Oath of Office and upholding and defending our Constitution, they have perilously violated both. This thesis is offered as a guide to correcting the situation.

 

Forest Glen Durland 5-9-03

 


Table of Contents

Prologue
Chapter I. The Problem
A. Statement of the Problem
B. Reason For the Study
C. Organization of the Thesis
D. Limitations of the Study
Chapter II. Definitions
Chapter III. Consitutional Supremacy
A. Constitution of the United States Is Supreme
B. Constitutional Limitation
C. 2nd Amendment
D. 4th Amendment
E. Internal Revenue Service
Chapter IV. Hierarchy of Enforcement
Sheriffs outrank Federal Agents
Chapter V. Laws and Notices
A. Onus of Enforcement
B. "Could have known and should have known"
C. CO6, Court Order Draft, 6th Update
Chapter VI. Reasoning and Considerations
A. Dismantling the Constitution
B. Excerpts from Constitutions and Legal Inculpations
____Excerpts from Constitutions
____Legal Inculpations
____Patriotic Implications
____Contemplation
Chapter VII. Summary and Conclusions
A. Summary
____Federal Government Scheme
B. Conclusion
Bibliography
Credits
Disclaimer
Index  
Appendices for Documention


Chapter I. The Problem

We are losing our country -- our Constitutional Republic. Analysis of the relentless action by selfish interests reveals an organized movement toward tyranny.

Because of its importance to this situation and the possibility to expose and correct government fraud, the Klamath Basis Crisis was selected. This crisis was created when federal agents closed the Headgates that control the irrigation water vital to the farmers in the Klamath Basin in southern Oregon and northern California.

An important point should be emphasized here: We, the people, are the government. We have lost when we refer to government as an entity apart from us. It is the plan of totalitarians to separate the subjects from government. We ARE the government in this Constitutional Republic, and we must bear that fact in mind constantly. For brevity and convenience, in this thesis government refers to our public servants that running our government for us.

 

A. Statement of the Problem

Few people understand the true meaning and power of the Constitution of the United States as the Law of the Land. It is the intent of this thesis:

1. to point out the true meaning of the Constitution.

2. to trace the origin to the Founding Fathers who wrote it.

3. to place this constitutional authority into today's perspective.

4. to list practical and legal remedies applicable to the farmers in America and in the Klamath Basin in particular.

B. Reason for the Study

Unfortunately, in this age in which we live, it is almost impossible for a patriot to earn a living while dedicating sufficient time for research to expose the rampant fraud and corruption at the national level. But I am trying. My personal goal is to save our Constitutional Republic for my issue -- my children and grandchildren. It is all I have left to give them.

It is to its everlasting credit that the Constitution of the United States remains intact, a beacon to guide this research that will lead to our survival and victory. Though tattered and torn by the blatant disregard of our public servants, weakened by the 16th and 17th amendments, and vandalized by the unconstitutional IRS, our Constitution remains etched in stone.

It will forever be a disgrace to our heritage that our public servants do not read stone.

C. Organization of the Thesis

After a brief discussion of the problem and definitions, the violations of our Constitution and pertinent laws are reviewed. The most valuable sources are the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, the cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Fiedor Report On the News.

This thesis is complete with summary, conclusion, bibliography and documentation.

D. Limitations of the Study

This study is limited to the analysis of cases and actions leading to the resurrection of the Constitution of the United States as the respected Law of the Land and the limiting of the central government to the size envisioned by our Founding Fathers. In addition, the practical application of these reforms is outlined so people can act to attain these ends. 


Chapter II. Definitions of Terms Used

American ConRep - American Constitutional Republic. Same as ConRep.

US ConRep - United States Constitutional Republic. Same as ConRep.

ConRep - Constitutional Republic as defined in the U.S. Constitution. (See Federal Government, below, and Statement of the Problem in the Documentation.)

ConRepism - following the U.S. Constitution which is respected as the law of the land, especially in our court system and federal government. (Term invented by Forest.) The Rule of Law as defined by Hayek is respected and observed.

ConRepist - one who adheres to ConRepism. (Not to be confused with ConRapist, which refers to Clinton.)

C2G - Clinton, Clinton and Gore

 

Federal government - that government defined by our United States Constitution: a Constitutional Republic. In this thesis, it is understood that we, the people, are that government. The people operating our federal government for us are collectively referred to as the federal government for convenience and simplification.

Democracy - The United States was NOT intended to be a democracy. Democracy feeds on itself, destroys itself and degrades into totalitarianism, followed by dictatorship. Democracy is defined as government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives. Note the absence of a constitution to protect the individual. (This concept is expanded in the Documentation.)

Fascism - a dictatorship similar to Communism. A major difference is that people hold title to property under Fascist rule, whereas they do not under Communism. Hitler's 3rd Reich was Fascist.

FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency. Created to control America in case of disaster or civil uprising. FEMA will be automatically turned on with two magic words uttered by the president: national emergency. Operating at the president's beck and call, FEMA will control everything. We may be under national emergency at this time, continuously since FDR.

Federalist Papers - “The Federalist Papers were written and published during the years 1787 and 1788 in several New York State newspapers to persuade New York voters to ratify the proposed constitution.” Written by three of our Founding Fathers, the Federalist Papers have been cited by the Supreme Court as a definitive document of the Constitution of the United States.

Treaty - Agreement with other nations that generates international law that supersedes the U.S. law but not the U.S. Constitution. Congress has been generating power beyond that authorized by the U.S. Constitution by abuse of the treaty mechanism. The United Nations charter is a treaty. This is ominous.

 

Laws - laws, rules and regulations that have the force and effect of law.

EO - executive order issued by the president or governor.

EL - Executive Law; made by the President; most probably NOT Constitutional; includes all ELs that Congress allows to become law after 30 days of Congressional inaction; includes Executive Orders (EO), Presidential Decision Directives (PDD), National Security Directives (NSD), National Security Decision Directives (NSDD), Presidential Proclamations (PP) and all such items. The ELs under discussion are those not authorized by the Constitution. CO6, below, discusses this item further. (The term EL was invented by Forest.) 

 

Rule of Law - “Stripped of all technicalities, this means that government in all its actions is bound by rules fixed and announced beforehand -- rules which make it possible to foresee with fair certainty how the authority will use its coercive powers in given circumstances and to plan one's individual affairs on the basis of this knowledge.”(Hayek, Road to Serfdom, p 80) (State of the Union 1998) (Fiedor Reports #76, 78, 98 and 113) Note that the Rule of Law is a concept, not a law. It is, to a degree, understood in the Constitution of the United States. The Rule of Law is the concept by which we are to obey our documented system of government as indicated by the Constitution of the United States and the resultant law. So, to say we follow the Rule of Law is to say that we follow the Constitution.

 

UN - United Nations. The UN is listing much of the U.S. as Heritage Sites, etc. Why? The United Nations Charter is a treaty. This is dangerous.

AHRI - American Heritage Rivers Initiative. An agreement, possibly unconstitutional, that gives control of many of our rivers to the federal government and possibly to the UN. Will this control our drinking and food growing water? See the Controls List for more on this subject.

Biosphere - a control mechanism of the U.S., the UN, and the UN's UNESCO Man and Biosphere Program (MAB); “Biosphere Reserves are areas of terrestrial and coastal ecosystems which are internationally recognized within the framework of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. Collectively, they constitute a World Network.” <http://www.unesco.org/mab/brfaq.htm>. The MAB and biosphere program were defunded by Congress, but still get funds through misappropriation. Since they are part of the UN, it is possible treaty law is being used here to dodge around the Constitution.

NSC - Nation Safety Council, an NGO.

NGO - non-governmental organization, possibly carrying out fraud and power grabs.

World Court, International Court of Justice (ICJ) - the UN court that the UN demands supersede all US courts.

Posse Comitatus - The use of United States military forces against American citizens. Federal law prohibits such action. It would seem that the Posse Comitatus Law would include all of the myriad of federal agencies and their enforcers, regardless of name, that are used to control American citizens, especially if the infractions concern unconstitutional laws and/or agencies. Clinton may have created a federal agency with the purpose of avoiding the posse comitatus law, but I can find nothing on it, not surprisingly. Bush has negated few, if any, of Clinton's creations (as of 4-15-03.)

 

Lies - see disinformation, noninformation, obfuscation, spin, hired liars

Disinformation - lies; intentional mistruth

Misinformation - mistakes; lies

Noninformation - distractions; secrecy

More discussion is at <http://www.uhuh.com/defs.htm>

 

FDR - President Franklin Delano Roosevelt

IBLs -International Bank Lords who own the international banks and hold the world by its economic throat. Fomerly BBLs was used, referring to the Billionaire Bank Lords.

USFS - United States Forest Service

EPA - Environmental Protection Agency

ESA - Endangered Species Act, the mutant child of the EPA.

OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration


Chapter III. Constitutional Supremacy

A. Constitution of the United States Is Supreme

 

1. The Constitution of the United States is at the top of the supreme law of the land.

2. Only amendments can alter the Constitution. Treaties definitely can not.

3. No one is above the Constitution, not even the President. (Stated in the Clinton impeachment hearings.)

4. The Constitution of the United States protects freedoms of individuals, not just groups.

5. The Rule of Law demands adherence to and respect of the Constitution.

6. All laws contradicting the Constitution are unconstitutional, null, void and unenforceable.

7. The Constitution is the job description for the federal government employees, from the President on down.

8.The Constitution is a limiting document. The Constitution tells the federal government what it CAN do, not what it can not. However, what the Constitution does NOT authorize the federal government to do, the federal government is NOT authorized to do. 95% of Congress and the White House should be in prison for violating that Constitutional law.

9.The U.S. Supreme Court has cited the Federalist Papers as an authoritative and definitive document for the U.S. Constitution and frequently cites it.

10. The Supreme Law of the Land consists of that trilogy known as the Constitution of the United States, the Federalist Papers and the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

 

 


B. Constitutional Limitation

The Federalist Papers state and/or imply that

 

Therefore:

The following are probable unconstitutional federal agencies, etc. (including but not limited to):

 

Only Congress can legally make laws and declare war.

Presidential ELs, other than those needed to operate the Executive Branch and the government as authorized by the Constitution and Congress, are unconstitutional, illegal, void and without force.

Judicial decisions that do not follow constitutional mandates and/or create new law are unconstitutional, illegal, void and without force. Judges are to judge, not legislate.

Only the Senate can ratify treaties. Without a constitutionally correct treaty, no one can give any power whatsoever to the United Nations (UN), not even the president.

Only the Senate can ratify treaties. Without a constitutionally correct treaty, no one can give any power whatsoever to the United Nations (UN), not even the president. Various devices are in use to avoid constitutional mandates. These include:

 

 

Regrettably, Congress and the President are using the treaty mechanism to override Constitutional limitations. This is causing a great deal of uncertainty in the lives of Americans. It also seems to be nullifying the rule of law. The most serious threat is the UN Charter, which is a treaty.

But shining bright through all this graft, the Constitution remains intact. Only amendments can alter the Constitution. Treaties, the President and agencies can not. The people must stand and keep it that way.


C. 2nd Amendment

In 2001, in violation of the Constitution of United States, and responding to false data, the federal government closed the Headgates controlling irrigation water to nearly 1500 farmers in the Klamath Basin. Soon about 1200 of those farmers were in financial peril. The farmers showed their objection by setting up a camp at the Headgates, attracting national attention. Armed federal agents were dispatched to the scene. Twice the farmers opened the gates. When federal agents closed the gates for the last time, five armed agents stood in front in ready to draw stance. That was an “in-your-face” statement aimed at the farmers. That was an unconstitutional armed assault by unconstitutional agents unconstitutionally occupying private land. That was tantamount to a police state. This old army veteran was there and witnessed the event, pointing out the stance to the media.

Those offensive actions by the federal government have prompted the inclusion of a discussion of the 2nd Amendment in this thesis. Our Founding Fathers expected us to keep guns to protect life, liberty and property, and to keep an errant government in check. Page after page in the Federalist Papers discuss this concept.

The Constitution of the United States guarantees our right to bear arms -- that is, to own guns, and to use them to defend against an errant government and for protection of life, liberty and property. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States merely iterates that right. This is extremely important to know in this day and age of federal government control far and beyond the limitations set forth in the United States Constitution. This could easily be viewed as a gross misuse of the treaty mechanism, for treaties are meant to be used between countries, not within our country to alter our Constitution. Background for this concept will be found in the Federalist Papers in many places.

No where in the Constitution are Congress and the President granted authority to regulate our gun ownership, yet they are doing just that. Perhaps those living off our taxes do not trust the tax payers with guns. Has the servant become the master?

It is entirely possible that the only rights that really remain are two: speech and guns. Here in California, those two are gravely curtailed. The laws of hate crimes and the demands of political correctness are destroying our schools, our families and our society, thus curtailing free speech. Getting a gun to the shooting range is almost a risky business. Carrying a gun for self defense is so curtailed as to be practically useless. You will probably be laughed at if you apply for a CCW - a concealed carry weapon permit.

It is highly probable that our less than devoted leaders in Washington, DC will not remove our freedom of speech before they remove our guns. The private gun owners in America constitute one of the largest and best equipped armed forces in the world. For the sake of their families and their country, they are well advised to keep it that way. The very fact that the people are armed is sufficient reason for our “fearless” elected public servants to fear us. Then, and probably only then, will they legislate to our benefit rather than theirs. The Federalist Papers allocate much space to this issue.

Consequently, it is drastically urgent that all people remain cognizant of their rights and liberties while they can still do something about defending them.

The abundant documentation below will speak for itself.

 


D. 4th Amendment

Another frequent violation of our Constitutional rights is the blatant disregard of our rights concerning searches, seizures and arrests, reiterated in the 4th Amendment. Unreasonable breaking, entering, arresting, and confiscating property are considered constitutionally illegal unless proceeded by an affidavit sworn before a judge who then must issue the warrant. The 6 H's -- who, what, when, where, why and how come -- must be written on the warrant. The Federalist Papers and the 4th Amendment to the Constitution are very clear on this subject. No one legally can, except for certain circumstances, break, enter, arrest you or take your property without such a warrant. This certainly applies to federal officers, regardless of whom gives them orders.

However, the law varies in use. The word “unreasonable” is important here. In common practice a warrant is generally required for entry into a building, but not necessarily for individuals. The interpretation of the 4th Amendment is deteriorating. A recent Supreme Court decision has ruled that instruments that see through walls require a warrant. Your local judge interprets the law. Let us hope that the judge knows the difference between local and federal officers, regardless of the influence.

Road blocks are also unconstitutional. We don't need any Check Point Charlies over here. Also illegal is posse comitatus - the use of United States military forces against United States civilians. That is not why we pay our federal taxes.


E. Internal Revenue Service

Another severe and unconstitutional liability on the farmers is the IRS. Congress and the President have created that cumbersome giant for the most probable reason to acquire funds for their ways of helping people by helping them out of their money. History has shown that this procedure leads to ultimate control and totalitarianism.

But why they are so hard on the farmers leads one to conclude that our “devoted” leaders wish to bankrupt our farmers and place America at the mercy of the 3rd world nations for food. Why else would Washington, DC create GATT and NAFTA and tax American farmers more than farmers in any other industrialized nation? Our food producers adhere to strict controls when using pesticides, fertilizers and labor. Yet food is being imported that has been grown with none of these controls with the consequence that we do not know what we are eating, while American farmers are going broke.

The obvious solution is to negate the IRS. The tax will not be needed if our federal government is trimmed back to the intent of our Founding Fathers.

Detailed discussion will be found in Money Is Unreal: Blowing the Whistle on the Federal Reserve System.

 


Chapter IV. Hierarchy of Enforcement

Sheriffs outrank Federal Agents

 

Under normal circumstances as planned by our Founding fathers, county sheriffs have power over federal agents where the federal government is limited by the U.S. Constitution. County sheriffs have the power and responsibility to stop within their borders those federal agents overstepping their bounds. The limiting power of the U.S. Constitution, reiterated by its inherent 9th and 10th Amendments, come into play here. But with the upsetting use of the treaty mechanism, our American way of life is changing toward a Fascist government. Recent Supreme Court cases are reversing this trend, however.

The oaths of office mandated by the United States Constitution and the Constitutions of the several States are within this issue. Of interest is the lack of a time limit on oaths. Those oaths sworn by officers in the United States military service are probably still in force. Likewise for all other public offices.

Sheriffs are also responsible for the Onus of Enforcement discussed in this thesis.

Sheriffs must NOT cooperate with federal agents agents in unconstitutional acts.

Sheriffs must stop, in their county, federal agents who attempt to commit unconstitutional acts.

Sheriff Mattis of Big Horn County, Wyoming set a national precedent. A court case was involved After studying the U.S. Constitution, he concluded that he was responsible for legal action concerning citizens within his county. He therefore required all federal agents to obtain clearance from his office before proceeding in his county. Federal agents had not argued as of the last time Forest talked to Sheriff Mattis.

This same precedent carries over to county courts, logical reasoning would conclude. The 9th and 10th Amendments must be addressed and followed. The story and documentation are at <http://www.uhuh.com/action/sheriff/list-shf.htm>.

Interested sheriffs are encouraged to contact Sheriff Mattis. He will talk to other sheriffs, but prefers not to become embroiled in events with the media. See the above url for contact information.

Gun Owners of America has also published an article on this same subject at http://www.gunowners.org/op0021.htm .

Much information on the gun subject will be found at http://www.uhuh.com/guns/list-gun.htm.

Another very important Supreme Court case on this subject is PRINTZ, SHERIFF/CORONER, RAVALLI COUNTY, MONTANA v. UNITED STATES <http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/95-1478.html> Some people call this case the Mack case. Jay Printz was sheriff of Ravalli County, Montana, and Richard Mack was sheriff of Graham County, Arizona. Both sheriffs claimed that the Brady Law was unconstitutional and both sheriffs suffered at the polls. Honesty is indeed expensive. We may be under national emergency at this time, continuously since FDR.

 

Of interest here is the threatening move by the federal government to take control of all police and sheriff forces. National emergency laws are on the books to accomplish this feat quickly. It does require the president to declare a national emergency, two magic words, thus putting FEMA in charge of everything and answering to the president. But martial law is unconstitutional. This quickly becomes a serious discussion that should be hot on the lips of every patriotic American.


Chapter V. Laws and Notices

A. Onus of Enforcement

All American citizens, certainly elected officials and peace officers, are required by patriotic duty and federal law to report violations of law.

Those allowing violations are most probably guilty of violating

1. Oath of Office.

2. Rule of Law.

3. Color of Law.

4. Misprision of Felony law.

5. Accessory After the Fact law.

6. Posse Comitatus law if the military is involved.

All of these laws, with the possible exception of oath of office, could be overpowered by a national emergency or international law derived from treaties. This is a serious dilemma.

1. Oath of Office requires swearing to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, and to their state constitution for other than federal officials. All federal and most state and local elected officials must swear to such an oath. If there is no time limit on their oath, it may be forever.

2. Rule of Law. “Stripped of all technicalities, this means that government in all its actions is bound by rules fixed and announced beforehand -- rules which make it possible to foresee with fair certainty how the authority will use its coercive powers in given circumstances and to plan one's individual affairs on the basis of this knowledge.” (Rule of Law is a concept, not a law.)

3. Color of Law refers to using a law illegally. 18 USC 242 makes it illegal for a government official to deprive rights under color of law: "Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, . . . shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." (Fiedor Report #83, 84 and 86)

4. Misprision of Felony. 18 USC 4 makes illegal the misprision of felony. This law states: "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." (See Fiedor Report #86 for most of these laws.)

5. Accessory After the Fact. 18 USC 3 makes Accessory after the fact a felony: "Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact."

6. Posse Comitatus law states that U.S. military forces may not be used against American civilians. People should be watching action by Congress on this one. The trend is ominous.

Most of these laws are covered in Fiedor Report #86. <http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/hu86.htm#CrimesAgainstThePeople,86>

Also see “PROTECTING OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS” (Fiedor Report On the News #243), a monument to trimming down excessive government. <http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/fron243.htm>

 

To enable citizens to prosecute wayward politicians and federal agents, the following laws have been enacted. Congress passed them and the President signed them, so they must have been intended to be used:

2 USC 441e prohibits election donations by foreigners.

2 USC 441f prohibits donations in another person's name.

5 USC 706 encourages citizens to take overbearing federal regulatory agents and bureaucrats to court. See “Protecting Our Property Rights” near the end of this thesis for documentation and further discussion.

18 USC 201(c)(2) prohibits purchased testimony.

18 USC 219 prohibits American public servants from being foreign agents.

18 USC 241 bars conspiracy against rights. See “Protecting Our Property Rights” near the end of this thesis for documentation and further discussion.

18 USC 242 deals with deprivation of rights under color of law. See “Protecting Our Property Rights” near the end of this thesis for documentation and further discussion.

18 USC 600 prohibits rewards to political candidates.

18 USC 602 prohibits federal employee from receiving political donations from federal employees.

18 USC 603 prohibits political donations by federal employees.

18 USC 607 prohibits receiving election donations on federal property.

18 USC 1001 makes lying a crime. Includes fraudulent statements or representations.

18 USC 1510 prohibits obstruction of communication of information by bribery.

18 USC 1956 prohibits financial transactions for illegal activities.

 


B. "Could have known and should have known"

[ All bold type was added by Forest Glen Durland ]

Those allowing violations to continue without objection “"could have known and should have known".

The precedent for this case dates all the way back to Abraham Lincoln: “Government possessing the power to create and issue currency and credit as money and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not (2) borrow capital at interest as the means of financing governmental work and public enterprise.”

"need not and should not". Note this early use of the precedent "could have known and should have known", ruled in the case of Lashley v. Koerber, California, 1945. In this 1945 case, the appellant court held a physician liable because he could have known and should have known. It was summarized that a physician could be expected to exercise a "... reasonable degree of skill and learning and care ordinarily exercised by other doctors of good standing in the community ... ." Considered was the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself), where the plaintiff does not cause the problem, and the defendant is assumed guilty if defendant knowingly allowed or caused the harm to happen, or was negligent in preventing that harm when defendant should have and could have prevented it.

Forest Glen Durland insists that this precedent implies and applies to all people licensed by the public to be trusted by that public to perform in a capacity demanded of their profession. This precedent, then, reaches out to all professionals licensed by the public. Furthermore, those licenses are for the protection of that public. Forest Glen Durland insists that all professional people, bankers, real estate agents, car salesmen and certainly all government workers (politicians, Congress Persons), especially those elected to offices of trust and power, are affected by that court ruling, which must be considered a precedent of the land.

All elected officials, certainly, could have known and should have known, or they could have not been and should not be there.

Most certainly Congress and the President could have and should have known what they were doing to our Constitutional Republic and our American way of life when they created the current mess of treaties that enable them to dodge around the limits of the Constitution.

(2) The above is an abstract of Lincoln’s monetary policy from Mayor McGeer’s Conquest of Poverty and has been certified as correct by the Legislative Reference Service of the Library of Congress at the instance of Hon. Kent Keller, Member of the House of Representatives. See 76th Congress, 1st Session, Jan 3 - Aug 5, 1939, Senate Documents #10304, Vol 3, Senate Document 23, "National Economy and the Banking System of the United States" by Robert L. Owen, presented by Mr. Logan on January 24, 1939, page 91. For those of you who like researching the original, try your local university or state library. Ask if their library is a federal repository. Senate Document 23 will probably be on microfiche. It is much easier to order it in booklet form from Peter Cook, Monetary Science Publishing, Box 86, Wickliffe, OH 44092. Ask for #761001-A, 2076 - “Tricentennial U. S. A.”

The entire document and documentation will be easier found at

<http://www.uhuh.com/unreal/lincoln.htm#CouldHaveKnown>

 


C. CO6

Court Order Draft, 6th Update

The federal government (i.e., the people operating our government) was placed on notice in April, 1998 by CO2 (updated to CO6). This included Congress with its Senators and Representatives from the several states, as well as our top judges.

The notices were sent by certified mail, return receipt. The return receipts are on file in a secure location.

CO2 listed violations by the federal government and the responsibility of federal employees operating our federal government, especially elected ones, to recognize and correct violations.

The laws backing this responsibility were outlined.

Of serious consideration here is the fact that CO2 identified the unseen enemy, bringing treason to reason. Judges openly and carelessly violating the Constitution are advised to please be advised.

Even without this notice, they have no excuse. After all, federal lawmakers can certainly be expected to know the Constitution of the United States, its pertinent laws and court cases, and the Federalist Papers. And many, if not most, of them are lawyers. They have no excuse not to know or not to have known.

 


 

Chapter VI. Reasoning and Considerations

A. Dismantling the Constitution

The Constitution of the United States, and hence, our Constitutional Republic, is literally being dismantled and destroyed. President Hoover set a precedent of establishing law through the use of executive orders (EOs). Building on that unconstitutional precedent, Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) did more to destroy our Constitutional Republic than anyone before or since. Yet a new level was reached under the devastating reign of Clinton, Clinton and Gore (C2G). (Hillary Clinton was our First Lady, our unconstitutional first Co-President and our First Lesbian. C2G stained our White House.) By ratifying treaties, Congress is giving itself power through international law that is not authorized by the Constitution. In this manner the treaty power mechanism of the Constitution is being used to avoid the Constitution. This destructive progress must be reversed and eliminated. FDR also put the nation on national emergency status (NES), thus increasing his executive power. Apparently those in the White House and Congress like that power, because we have been under NES almost continuously ever since.

Few in Congress seem to even care about our Constitution these days. Big government is steadily controlling more and more of people's lives to the detriment of all Americans. Liberties are being dispensed with. For example, literally devastated are the lives and ways of life of the farmers in the Klamath Falls area in Oregon and California, and the small land owners in the Washington State. Few people understand their rights in our Constitutional Republic or how to defend them. Most attorneys know less, a national tragedy.

 In the smaller picture we find the farmers in the Klamath Basin being forced out of business by unconstitutional acts of the federal government. In the larger picture, we see this action nationally in a magnitude that indicates an organized dismantling of our agricultural industry. Whoever is implementing this national disaster is relentlessly reducing the United States to dependency on Third World Countries for food. The world economy is an oil economy that is fully controlled. The United States of America should be energy independent, but is dependent on imported oil from Third World Nations. With drinking and farming water also controlled, America will soon be at the mercy of those in control of those human necessities. It could easily be concluded at that point that America would no longer be free, but would have definitely entered into the final stage of a total dictatorship.

It is the wish of this author that this thesis will cause America to wake up and stand up to those less than loyal public servants steering our country down the road to disaster.

 

 B. Excerpts from Constitutions and Legal Inculpations

Excerpts from Constitutions

To support the American citizens in their fight for their property and personal rights, appropriate excerpts from four state constitutions, as well as the Constitution of the United States, have been included. Water rights were included to help farmers determine where they, their county and their state should take control from a bloated and overpowering federal government. Oaths of offices have been excerpted to show the people what to expect and demand from their political leaders, as well as a remedy for corruption. The treaty provisions of the Constitution of the United States were included to make them aware of the bold by-passing of the Constitution being done by Congress and the President. (These excerpts are in the Appendix. For treaties, please read “Constitution Trumps Treaties”.)

 

Legal Inculpations

Careful study of the Supreme Law of the Land -- that trilogy comprising the Constitution of the United States , the Federalist Papers and cases of the Supreme Court of the United States -- reveals that the federal government has neither business nor right to control water in the Klamath River watershed in Klamath County, Oregon. The sheriff of Klamath County, Oregon should have the ultimate policing authority in that county. Therefore, the sheriff of Klamath County, Oregon could have and should have the power to order all federal agents off the water project and control in Klamath County, which includes Upper Klamath Lake. But he did not do it. (Seldom do we see honorable sheriffs like Mack, Printz and Mattis.) The same is probably true in Siskiyou County, California, which includes Lower Klamath Lake. This premise should hold for all farmland and its water in the United States.

The federal government is using international law gained through treaties to gain power not granted them by the Constitution. One cannot help but compare this to the police states so dominating in the last Century. Using this deceptive mechanism, the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), and its mutant child, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) have come into power. Research shows that the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are also so empowered. This unconstitutional charade has caused a devastating situation for the farmers in the Klamath Basin and our Constitution Republic.

The U.S. military may still have an installation near Tule Lake, but that should have no bearing on the farms and the use of water downstream. In addition, it is doubtful that any land in the Klamath Basin was properly ceded to the federal government by the States of Oregon and California as mandated by the Constitution of the United States.

In the State of Washington, that state government is practically taking control of some private property because a stream flows through it.

 

This thesis concentrates on those unalienable rights guaranteed by our Constitution to individual American citizens, and on the limitations of our federal government, also guaranteed by our Constitution.

Patriotic Implications

I believe in and love my country. I am a firm supporter of our Constitutional Republic. It is the gross and blatant deviation from our original Constitution that alarms me.

I believe that there is nothing wrong with our Constitution Republic (except the 16th and 17th Amendments, which deviate from the Founding Fathers' original intent.) However, our elected officials operating our federal government have been disregarding the United States Constitution to the point that we are seriously in danger of losing the liberties guaranteed by our Constitution. Congress is expanding its power beyond our Constitution through the treaty mechanism. The mainstream media is disregarding this problem to the point of disinformation. A simple solution is to force our political representatives to consider the Constitution of the United States before any and all legislation and overhaul the treaties, or vote them out of office. But before this is to be accomplished, the people must be informed of their rights in this matter. Then the problem of piercing the less than honest media presents itself. The Internet is helping to solve that problem.

A knowledge of their rights as guaranteed by our Constitution of the United States, explained in the Federalist Papers and backed by the Supreme Court, will enable people to demand justice for their cause. The research on oaths will inform the people of the obligations to which their elected officials swore. A knowledge of constitutional and common law water rights will help the people determine where the elected leaders operating our federal government have overstepped their constitutional limits. The discussion of the power of the county sheriffs will inform the people about the policing power that is to properly represent them and protect their life, liberty and property, as well as from an errant government. The discussion of treaty power will temper all other discussions.

A rather interesting point can be applied with oaths: If constitutionally mandated oaths do not include an ending date, then they may be thought of as lasting forever, even after leaving office. E.g., if a person once accepted a commission in the armed forces of the United States and swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, he/she would still be obligated to that oath. Another scenario: If a person, upon accepting any government job, swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, he/she would still be obligated to that oath. Interesting. One might check this item as needed. Consequences affecting one's present position would be applicable, it would seem.

 

The very limited role of the federal government has been covertly augmented through treaty power, disregard and misappropriation.

Through civil disobedience, unconstitutional agencies and laws may often be negated. Government only works when citizens work it.

 

Contemplation

This thesis is not intended to be the final word. Rather, the people are encouraged to learn from this research, stand up for their rights and see that those rights are restored. For example, concerning the Klamath Lake and River water problem, it might be Constitutionally legal and proper for the sheriffs in Klamath County, Oregon and Siskiyou County, California to throw all federal agents out on their posteriors. The documentation is all here. The people must stand up on their hind legs and take back their country -- their government, their land, their farms, their water, and their lives.

An important point should be emphasized here: We, the people, are the government. We have lost when we refer to government as an entity apart from us. It is the plan of totalitarians to separate the subjects from government. We ARE the government in this Constitutional Republic, and we must bear that fact in mind constantly.

There is nothing wrong with our Constitutional Republic, which is our federal government (except the 16th and 17th Amendments, which deviate from the Founding Fathers' original intent.) The serious problems emanate from the feral punks in Washington, DC who are running our federal government into the ground. They should be talked to very seriously by persuasive means. (There are about ten honorable exceptions in Congress, at most twenty.)

This Constitutional Republic will only work when we taxpaying, voting citizens work it.

Ben Franklin summed it up well: "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

 

 


Chapter VII. Summary and Conclusions

A. Summary

Federal Government Scheme

 (An important concept from Definitions is repeated here: The federal government is that government defined by the United States Constitution. In this thesis, it is understood that we, the people, are that government. The public servants operating our federal government for us are collectively referred to as the federal government for convenience and simplicity.)

Being aware of the dangers of making fact out of fiction derived from idle thought, there nonetheless exists that possibility that the guys and gals running our government are up to something not beneficial to we people. Perhaps offering a few ideas here will alert people to look for adverse developments. It is generally agreed that the bureaucrats in Washington, DC are prone to pass out disinformation. It is even more agreed that the mainstream media delivers more misinformation than truth. Let us examine a few points. (Detailed documentation is in the Appendix.)

 

The federal government is limited to the mandates of the Constitution of the United States.

The federal government land ownership is limited to the Capitol, forts, post roads, etc.

Some of the misuse of the commerce clause has been struck down by the Supreme Court.

It is unconstitutional for the federal government to be controlling any water in the Klamath Lake and Klamath River watershed, or the dam and gates at Upper Klamath Lake. In the arguments here, water is considered as “running with the land”.

If the federal government has no business managing Klamath Lake, it is highly probable the federal government is libel for all damage to the farms due to water shortage. When one farmer went broke, he killed himself. What price should be placed on his life? Two federal laws enable people to take action.

The mouth of the Klamath River is at an isolated stretch of the Pacific Coast. At the Klamath River headwaters is (or was) a government installation. Is there a connection here? If so, was that land properly ceded by the state?

Even though the Klamath River runs through two states, that should not be federal government concern. That is the concern of Oregon and California. The commerce clause does not seem to apply here. The Lopez Supreme Court case put limits on the use of the commerce clause.

It is most probable that the sheriffs of Klamath and Siskiyou Counties have authority to order federal government agents out of their counties, jailing them if they resist.

The Bureau of Reclamation (BoR), the Department of the Interior (DoI), the Department of Agriculture (DoA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are controlling land, water and improvements along the Klamath River Watershed in Oregon and California. This is unconstitutional. Those holdings must be ceded first to the citizens holding the deeds and rights, then to the several states and their people.

The United States Forest Service (USFS) may need discussion here. The USFS has closed miles of roads, prohibiting fire fighting and causing loss of huge tracts of timber. I can not find in the U.S. Constitution where the federal government is given authority to do anything with forests. That land must be ceded first to the citizens holding the deeds and rights, then to the several states and their people.

The American Heritage Rivers Initiative (AHRI) has been usurping and giving control of our rivers to the federal government and the UN. This is unconstitutional. Is control of drinking and farming water the reason?

The United Nations (UN) has selected Heritage Sites, etc. along the entire length of the Klamath River watershed from the Pacific Ocean to Crater Lake and Tule Lake. Why? (Twenty one sites are listed below.) The UN Charter is a treaty. That bodes ill. Treaties can not supersede the Constitution. Therefore, the UN is involved in illegal actions.

UN biospheres (MAB) have been disapproved and defunded by Congress, yet, through misappropriation, the biosphere program continues to receive funds and to expand. Again, the UN being a treaty, this is unconstitutional and highly illegal.

There are numerous articles stating that the UN wants our guns. According to our Founding Fathers writing in the Federalist Papers, that spells the end to freedom and our Constitutional Republic. Since the Federalist Papers instruct that we are expected to keep guns ready to protect life, liberty and property, and to repel an errant government, that right is unalienable. Being a treaty, the UN has no standing here.

The UN is demanding that its International Court of Justice (ICJ; also know as the World Court) be recognized as superior to all United States courts. This is a serious threat to our national sovereignty and must be halted. It can not and it must not supersede our Constitution.

 

Many law enforcement agencies have been violating our unalienable rights as reiterated in the 4th Amendment governing our security against unreasonable searches, seizures and arrests. It will be effort well spent to see that they follow the Constitution, together with the applicable Supreme Court rulings.

 

As you folks proceed to take back your country, your land, your water and your way of life, it will be to your benefit to be aware of your Constitutional rights in this respect. Ample documentation is included the Appendix.

 

It should be noted here that the United Nations (UN) is a very bad outfit. A few of the UN's many forms are UNESCO, MAB and Heritage Sites. It is highly probable that the UN is striving for global totalitarianism -- total, dictatorial control of all governments. To us old Vets, that means Hitler type, Nazi dictatorship, world wide. And this time there will be no America to come charging to our rescue. That will be it. So, when I spotted 21 areas in and near the Klamath River watershed that the UN has listed, the alarm bells went off. A good question arises: Just what is the UN doing there? Our Constitution prohibits federal and foreign control of our land and its water. This poses additional threats to our freedom through violation of international law. The UN Charter is a treaty that can NOT and must NOT supersede our Constitution. Congressman Ron Paul has been trying valiantly to negate the UN Treaty, but few inside the Washington Beltway listen to his sage advice. One cannot help but theorize why.

 

I do not know exactly what the goons that are running our federal government are up to, but it is not good. It bodes ill. And when it occurs to me that they are doing it to us with our tax money, and with our land and water, I become furious. And then when it occurs to me that the federal government has no business doing all that nasty, inconvenient stuff in the first place, I act. But one person can not do it alone -- It will take large groups of people shouting loud and clear and presenting their bodies for emphasis to straighten out this mess. Perhaps it will require armed bodies.

The farmers in the Klamath Basin near Klamath Lake in Oregon, the small land owners in the State of Washington, and all farmers and land owners in America must stand up with the Constitution, and possibly their guns, in their hands. It's about time somebody stood up for their rights. This thesis is my effort to help you. I wish you the best of luck. It could be that the way you go, could be the way that America goes. We need your noble effort, folks.

 

In my years of fighting government corruption, I have observed few, if any, instances where the people running our federal government backed down. They stall when resistance becomes too vocal, but later, after the public quiets down, they go right on with their plan, often changing the title. (Hillary's "It Takes A Village" and Bill Clinton's EO 13086 that destroyed federalism come to mind.) The most treacherous aspect of this plan is that they have plenty of time and money. They are operating with our tax money and land, putting them in the elite control position, and putting we people in the “pay till we bleed” position. That could get to a guy right down there where it's downright aggravating. If the farmers do not stand up for their rights and break this trend, we may all suffer drastically.

As for the EPA and those pests they are protecting, look as I will, I can not find any place in the United States Constitution that gives the federal government the right to even start thinking about such projects. For sure the federal government has absolutely no right to hold, control or regulate that land and the water than runs with it. That makes that whole scheme totally unconstitutional. And no treaty can overrule that limitation. So what do those goons in Congress in Washington, DC think they are pulling off? If I tried to do something like that, I would be in jail immediately. It long past time we utilized 5 USC 706 and put a host of our public “servants” in prison. That's what that law is for.

 

You folks and your sheriff most probably have the right to throw out all federal agents when those federal agents are outside the law. And the Constitution of the United States stands tall at the top of the supreme law of OUR land. Herein are the facts you need to get going.

Stand tall and proud, Folks. My heart goes with you.

 

B. Conclusion

In the smaller picture we find the farmers in the Klamath Basin being forced out of business by unconstitutional acts of the federal government. In the larger picture, we see this action nationally in a magnitude that indicates an organized dismantling of our agricultural industry. Whoever is implementing this national disaster is relentlessly reducing the United States to dependency on Third World Countries for food. The world economy is an oil economy that is fully controlled. The United States of America should be energy independent, but is dependent on imported oil from Third World Nations. With drinking and farming water also controlled, America may soon be at the mercy of those in control of those human necessities. It could easily be concluded at that point that America would no longer be free, but would have definitely entered into the final stage of a total dictatorship.

A case in point -- When two 9th Circuit judges closed the Headgates in Klamath Falls, Oregon in 2001, they violated the Constitution to the point of treason. The facts are simple and final:

Therefore:

 

Winning action dictates:

 

The above reasoning applies to state laws and agencies that are based in any way upon unconstitutional federal agencies or laws. They are without power to enforce.

Following the implementation of this stand, the same action must be taken nationally in an effort to save our constitutional republic from total destruction.

It is a national disaster that very few attorneys comprehend the Constitution and the basic stand taken by this thesis.

 

In the overall scenario we see unconstitutional acts being done at public expense using public tax dollars.

 

In the total picture emerges a gnawing question: Why? And who?

 

This disastrous chain of events must be stopped. The first road block could be placed in the Klamath Basin. In fact, it is highly probable that so go the the farmers in the Klamath Basin, so goes America. This is not a fight to lose.

 

To honor their Oath of Office, the Constitution of the United States and the Misprision of Felony Law, judges must order all federal government agents off land and return all that land and water to the citizens holding the deeds and rights to that land and water, with the residual going to the county and state in which it is located.

 

On the shoulders of those two 9th Circuit judges rests the future of America. But instead of honoring their Oath of Office and upholding and defending our Constitution, they have perilously violated both. This thesis is offered as a guide to correcting the situation.

  

 

 


Bibliography

 

Cook, Peter. Monetary Science Publishing, Box 86, Wickliffe, OH 44092. Ask for #761001-A, "2076 - Tricentennial U. S. A."

Churchill, Winston. Birth of Britain, Vol. I. Dodd, Mead and Company. 1956. Pages 253-257.

Durland, Forest G. Money Is Unreal: Blowing the Whistle on the Federal Reserve System. Available on the Internet at <http://www.uhuh.com/unreal/contents.htm>.

Grace Commission Report. Available on the Internet at <http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/list-gra.htm>

Griffin, G. Edward. Creature of Jekyll Island. CA: Westlake Media, 1998. Send orders to American Media, P.O.Box 4646, Westlake Village, CA 91359-1646. For immediate phone and credit card orders, call (800) 595-6596.

Hayak, F.A. Road to Serfdom. University of Chicago Press, 1994. Get the latest edition. This is one of most important books ever written. You are not informed until you have read this book three times.

Kuehnelt-Leddihn, von, Erik. Leftism Revisited. Regnery, 1990. Your education is incomplete until you have read this book. It may be difficult to find.

Iacocca, Lee. Autobiography. NY: Bantam Books. C. 1984 by Lee Iacocca.

Iacocca, Lee. Talking Straight. NY: Bantam Books. C. 1998 and 1998 by Lee Iacocca.

Iserbyt, Charlotte Thomson. Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. Ravenna, Ohio: Conscience Press, 1999. (Pronounced pronounced ih' zr beet"). Conscience Press, P.O.Box 449, Ravenna, OH 44266-0449.

McGeer, Keller, Owen and Senate documents. See Could Have Known in Documentation.

Rossiter, Clinton. Federalist Papers. NY: Mentor, 1961. Published as a Penguin Book. You do not know your government and your liberties until you have read the Federalist Papers three times. The Federalist Papers were cited by the U.S. Supreme Court as an authoritative and definitive document for the U.S. Constitution.

Williams, Lindsey. Energy Non Crisis. Order from P.O.Box 7, Kasilof, AK 99610. Paper back and cassette available. Because of the outstanding public response that has been generated by this book, Lindsey Williams is in great demand for speaking engagements, radio and TV shows. He may be contacted at P.O.Box 7, Kasilof, AK 99610, phone (907) 262-4000.

 

Fiedor, Doug.

"State of the Union, 1998". A timeless essay.
http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/state98.htm#RuleofLaw,def,su98
http://www.uhuh.com/impeach/hyderule.htm from the Clinton impeachment hearings.
 
“Fiedor Report On the News”. The Contents and Index to these essays are an invaluable research tool. They are on the Internet at
Contents: http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/list-hu.htm
Index: http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/huindex.htm

(I am about six months behind on my indexing at the time of this writing, but am endeavoring to catch up. Forest)

 

Constitution of the United States

Declaration of Independence [Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776]

Three extremely important Supreme Court cases of significance here are New York, Lopez and Printz.

New York v. United States, 505 <http://laws.findlaw.com/us/505/144.html>

United States v. Lopez, ___ U.S. ___ (1995) <http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/u10287.html>

Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana v. United States <http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/95-1478.html>

 

Federal Jurisdiction, a brief by Lowell Becraft, is a profound treatise on that subject.

“Protecting Our Property Rights” (Fiedor Report On the News #243) is a monument to trimming down excessive government. <http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/fron243.htm>

"Court Cooks Glancing Goose" discusses a recent Supreme Court case that clips the wings on the Migratory Bird law nonsense. <http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/fron215.htm#COURTCOOKSGLANCINGGOOSE>

Becraft's Briefs - a listing of some of his works.  

 

The quotes from our founding documents in this thesis were copied from the Jon Roland's Constitution site on the Internet at <http://www.constitution.org/>. Another reliable founding document source is

<http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/federal/fed.htm>

 

Gun Owners of American (GOA) <http://www.gunowners.org/>

 

Sites for information that bear watching:

Information here may help in researching government's aims. Ecosystem Management. <http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/siskiyou/research.htm>

Good information site. <http://www.fs.fed.us/forum/nepa/welcome.htm>

Watch this unconstitutional agency: The EPA. <http://www.epa.gov/>

National Database On Environmental Management Systems. <http://www.eli.org/isopilots.htm>

The EPA is prepared to counter terrorism. This could mean more control for other reasons. <http://www.epa.gov/swercepp/cntr-ter.html>

 

The site for the Klamath Basin Farmers: <http://www.klamathbasincrisis.org/>


Credits

 

Doug Fiedor -- for his tireless writing and reliable Fiedor Report On the News (formerly Heads Up).

The Gun Owners of America for their source of quotes.

 


Disclaimer

 

This document has been written for your convenience. Great, scholarly care has been exerted to assure correctness. However, the contents and its maker will assume no liabilities. Therefore, please use this document as a guide. The sources are listed. Please check with the originals and rely on them.

 

Copyright 2001, 2003 by Forest Glen Durland.

This document may be copied and distributed, but only in its entirety and with no changes, and no monetary gain may be realized.

"Price of Free Corn" belongs to someone else. It is humbly presented here.

 

Index

Hot Links

Govsmall
govdocs1
govdocs2
govdocs3
FedGov
RuleLaw
6Hs
Excerpts
FederalGovScheme
Churchill
Durland,Money
GraceCommission
Griffin,Jekyll
Iacocca
Iserbyt,Charlotte
Williams,Lindsey
Fiedor,Doug

Alphabetical Index

No Hot Links

 This Index from the hard copy edition is included here to supply key words for searching.

The page numbers are meaningless here on the Internet.

16th and 17th Amendments, which deviate
18 USC 1001 - lying crime
18 USC 1510 - no obstruction by bribes
18 USC 1956 - no money for illegal
18 USC 219 - can not be foreign agents
18 USC 241 - protects rights
18 USC 241 Rights
18 USC 242 - color of law
18 USC 600 - no rewards to candidates
18 USC 602 - no donations accepted by fed employees
18 USC 603 - no donations by fed employees
18 USC 607 - no donations on fed property
2 USC 441e - no election donations by foreigners
2 USC 441f - donations in your name only
5 USC 706 - citizens prosecute agents
5 USC 706 - citizens take agents to court
6 H's
Abraham Lincoln
absolute rights
Accessory After the Fact
acts are simple and final
agencies, can not make laws
AHRI defined
Aiken, Judge, Magna Carta
Alden et al. v. Maine
Amendment2
Amendment 2 changed
Amendment 4
Amendment 4, see through
Amendment 4, unreasonable use
Amendment 6
Amendments 16 and 17
Amendments 9 and 10
Amer Com's Assn v. Douds
American Heritage Rivers Initiative (AHRI)
American way of life
Another Perspective on Gun Rights
arms to protect
Armstrong, Judge, Magna Carta
Basin Description Klamath
Becraft, Federal Jurisdiction
Becraft, Lowell
Becraft address
Becraft's Treaty Brief
beetle, filth eating
Biosphere defined
Blackstone's Commentaries
BLM
BoR

C2G added to FDR's harm

C2G - Clinton, Clinton and Gore

10

Cal Constitution

106

California, 10th Resolution

114

case in point

29

CCW in California not likely

16

Centrists

53

Check Point Charlie

16

Churchill

31

civil disobedience

25, 44

Clinton, Clinton and Gore (C2G)

23

CO6

77

CO6 placed government on notice

22

Cohens v. Virginia

67

Coho salmon tributary spawners

81

Color of Law

19

Columbia River Basin

83

commerce clause

59

Communism contrasted to Fascism

10

Communist Goals

74

Communist Planks

74

Congress does not care

23

Congress only can make laws, treaties, wars

14

Constitution, devices to avoid

14

Constitution, laws contrary void

58

Constitutional Republic OK exc 16 and 17th Amendments

25

Constitution guarantees our guns

15, 62

Constitution is, in itself, a Bill of Rights

13

Constitution is a limiting document

13

Constitution is Bill of Rights

57

Constitution is job description

63

Constitution is Supreme Law

54

Constitution is the job description

14

Constitution Limits

57

Constitution limits federal land

61

Constitution of the United States

24

Constitution Trumps Treaties

40, 141

contrary not valid

51

Controls List

41

Cook, Monetary Science Publishing

77

Cook, Peter

31

Could have, should have known

21, 77

Court Cooks Glancing Goose

41

Court Cooks Glancing Goose - Biblio

32

Creature of Jekyll Island

31, 74

Declaration of Independence

61

Declaration of Policy

15

Deliberate Dumbing, Biblio

31

Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

41

Democracy, US is not

52

Democracy decays into dictatorship.

52

devices to avoid Constitution

14

dictatorship

23, 28

Disclaimer

33

Disinformation defined

12

disinformation from bureaucrats

26

Duty of the People

59

elected officials operating our federal government have been disregarding the United States Constitution

24

EL - Executive Law

11

ELs illegal

14

Emerson 2nd Amendment Case

153

Emerson Gun Case

62

Endangered Species

81

energy independence

23, 28

Energy Non Crisis

41

EO - Executive Order

11

EPA

14, 24

EPA 11,808 pages regs

49

EPA and those pests they are protecting

28

EPA - defined

12

EPA is prepared to counter terrorism

32

EPA Strikes Anew

58, 150

errant government, people stop

58

ESA

24

ESA - defined

12

Executive Agreements

14

Fascism defined

10

Fascist

18

Fast Track

14

FDR

12

FDR destroyed Constitution

39

federal govt placed on notice 98

77

federalism

59

Federalist Papers #44, stability

49

Federalist Papers #45, separate powers

57

Federalist Papers #51, keep separate

57

Federalist Papers #62, slow change

48

Federalist Papers #78, Constitution Supreme

51

Federalist Papers #78, contrary void

58

Federalist Papers, Rossiter, ed.

31

Federalist Papers back Constitution

56

Federalist Papers limit

13

Federalist Papers say bear arms

14

Federalist Papers Supreme

24

Federalist Papers to persuade voters

54

Federal Jurisdiction

32

Federal Jurisdiction by Becraft

118

federal power grab

62

FEMA

10, 18

Fiedor, Court Cooks Goose

139

Fiedor, Doug

31, 131, 139, 150

 

Fiedor, Protecting Our Property Rights

131

Fiedor Report On the News #46

43

Fiedor Report On the News, Index

31

Florida water

41

forests

14

Franklin

25

Franklin, a Republic

38

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) did more to destroy

23

GATT

14

Gentleman's Agreement

15

GOA, credits

32

government does not back down

28

Griffin, G. Edward

31

Gun laws

14

Gun Owners of American (GOA)

18, 32

Gun Rights, Another Perspective

55

Hayek, Road to Serfdom

31

Hayek, Rule of Law

47

Hitler

59

Hoover precedent with EOs

38

Hyde, Rule of Law

47

Iacocca, Lee, Bibliography

31

IBLs - defined

12

Indian Nations not sovereign

146

Indians

146

Indians in K Falls sold out

147

Indian Treaties Closed Account

146

Intent of the Founders

38

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

11, 27

Irish interests own generating plant

112

IRS

14, 16, 74

Iserbyt, Charlotte Thomson, Biblio

31

Jefferson in the Dec

50

judges, 9th Circuit, in violation

30

judges are to judge, not legislate

14

judges must follow Constitution, rule of law

48

jurisdictional arguments have no standing

29

Kentucky, 10th Resolution

114

Kentucky Constitution

114

Klamath Basin Crisis site

32

Klamath River watershed

24

Land Grab Scam

42

Land Ownership

14

Lashley v. Koerber, California, 1945

21, 77

Laws, only Congress can make

60

laws, rules and regulations

49

Laws, USC

76

laws must be simple

61

Leftism Revisited

31

Lincoln’s monetary policy

77

Litvinov Agreement

15

Lopez

59

Lower Klamath Lake

24

MAB

11

Mack, Sheriff

18

Madison, James, Father Constitution

61

Madison, James, Fed Pap 62

48

Madison Warned Us

49

Magna Carta, American Style, Aiken

157

Magna Carta, American Style, Armstrong

158

Magna Carta, American Style, Bush

159

Magna Carta, American Style, Intro

156

mainstream media is disregarding this problem to the point of disinformation

24

martial law

18

Mattis, Sheriff

18

mechanics of UN dictatorship in place

41

Mellon, Lycos changed 2nd Am

65

Microsoft changed 2nd Am

65

migratory birds

144

misinformation from media

26

Misprision of Felony.

19

Modus Vivendi

15

monuments

14

More UN Foolishness

43

Multilateral Trade Agreements

14

national emergency --

18

national emergency, Hitler and here

59

National parks

14

Nebraska

41

"need not and should not"

21

New York v. US

32, 150

NGO

11, 14, 54

No Man above the law

59

Noninformation defined

12

Notes

160

Notes On the Constitution - 303

51

Notes On the Constitution - 305

51

NSC

11, 14, 54

NSD

11

NSDD

11

oath, Cal Constitution

106

oath, Kentucky Constitution

114

oath, Ore Constitution

107

oath, US Constitution

104

oath, Wn Constitution

113

Oath of Office

19

oaths: If constitutionally mandated oaths do not include an ending date, then they may be thought of as lasting forever

25

Offending judges, agents and “blind” politicians must be prosecuted

29

Ohio farms

41

Ore Constitution

107

OSHA

14

OSHA - defined

12

Our Workers Are Our Boss

59

Paul, Ron, agencies

60

Paul, Ron, Rule of Law

48

PDD

11

Plaintiffs initiating illegal lawsuits must be held liable

29

plan to control land

42

Platte River, Nebraska

41

police, UN

43

police states

24

Pollard v. Hagan

58, 150

Posse Comitatus

19

Posse Comitatus defined

12

Price of Free Corn

115

Printz, Sheriff

18

Printz... v. US

18, 32, 151

Prologue

7

Protecting Our Property Rights

83

Protecting Our Property Rights - Biblio

32

Protecting Our Property Rights - Fiedor

131

Protocol

15

Report, Senate, 19th C

71

Report, Senate, 20th C

69

REPORT, Senate on arms

69

res ipsa loquitur

21, 77

Resolutions

15

Resolutions, support 10th Am

114

Road blocks

16

Road to Serfdom

52

Roland, Jon

32

Roosevelt, President Franklin D.

148

Rule of Law

15, 19, 47

Rule of Law, Docs

52

Rule of Law defined

11

Rule of Law is a concept

47

searches, seizures and arrests limited

16

Senate documents

31

sheriff

24

Sheriff Mattis

18

Siskiyou County

24

So go Klamath farmers, so goes US

7, 29

Southwest BLM land

41

State of the Union 1998

31, 55

State of Wn

24

Those Unalienable Rights

49

treaties

21, 25

treaties, Constitution

39

Treaties, Constitution Trumps

141

treaties are binding

60

Treaties can NOT supersede

40

treaty, Litvinov Agreement

148

treaty, Mexico, pursue across border

148

Treaty defined

11

treaty mechanism

11, 15

treaty power

23

Treaty Power Abuse

39

Tule Lake

24

two magic words --

18

UN, Cal animals

92

UN, Cal plants

95

UN, Kentucky animals

102

UN, Kentucky plants

103

UN, Ore animals

99

UN, Ore plants

100

UN, Wn animals

101

UN, Wn plants

101

UN 21 sites Klamath

81

UN agents are immune in US

84

unalienable

50

unalienable rights

24

UN biospheres defunded

27, 83

UN Charter is a treaty

15

unconstitutional federal agencies and laws

14

unconstitutional law not binding

58

UN demands superior courts

83

UNESCO

11

UN flora and fauna

91

UN has selected Heritage Sites on Klamath

27

UN Heritage Sites on Klamath

27

UN into 98% of our land

83

United Nation

14

United Nations (UN) is a very bad outfit

27

United Nations Charter

11

United Nations Sites

85

United States Forest Service (USFS)

26

UN not nice

80

UN stockpiling equipment

84

UN's view of Upper Klamath Lake

89

UN wants our guns

72, 80

USC Laws

76

US Constitution

104

USFS

84

USFS - defined

12

USFS has closed miles of roads

26

US military

24

US v. Lopez

32

US v Emerson

62

violate if argue

29

Watch this one

112

Water runs with the land

29

we, the people, are that government

26

Williams,Lindsey

41

Wn Constitution

113

Wn State small land owners

28

World Court

11, 27

world government

43

Appendices

for Documentation

Appendix 1 for Document Contents, Prologue, Chapter I and Chapter II.

Appendix 2 for Chapters III through VII.

Appendix 3  For Supporting Documents


Weasel Clause

The main file became so large the links ran past the limit. The use of appendices solves that problem. The hard copy edition does not have this limitation, so no addenda is used there.  

For convenience, this document titled Limited Federal Government has been posted on the Internet. Most documentation there is at your fingertips. The url is

<http://www.uhuh.com/action/govltd/govsmall.htm>.

All items in this appendix are copyrighted whether or not indicated on each page, subject to the rights of copied material. All rights are reserved.


Go to Appendix 1 for Document Contents, Prologue, Chapter I and Chapter II.

Go to Appendix 2 for Chapters III through VII.

Go to Appendix 3  For Supporting Documents

 

Go to the Appendices for Limited Federal Government

Go Back to the List of Limited Government Items

Go to the uhuh opening Title Page

Go the uhuh Home Page


The President and Congress said they are reducing taxes and balancing the budget. uhuh. Sez who?

Smile and Force Congress to Kick the Debt & Taxes Habit with Money System Honesty for We People. We demand the whole truth with an honest viewpoint.

Don't send money. Call Jo(e) Congress and send letters.

Click here to contact Forest.

Web Home Page: www.uhuh.com


  Back to the top of this page
This web page can NOT be altered or sold, but may be copied intact with credit to uhuh for reasonable distribution in keeping with the philosophy of uhuh and GR Force, who can assume no liabilities. Please check the sources and make your own decisions.
The term U-Mail, uhuh and this web page are Copyright 1996 and 2010 by Forest Glen Durland, subject to rights of article owrner.
govsmall.htm. Revised  1-25-10. uhuh and GR Force are non-profit.