Heads Up

 

A Weekly edition of News and Views from around our country

 

November 1, 1996 #7

 

by: Doug Fiedor fiedor19@eos.net

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please Distribute Widely

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

VOTING FOR GORE

Many of the White Water grand jury indictments have been issued.

They have been typed and signed, then retyped and resigned. Now they are

ready to be released -- after the election.

Three good Washington sources say that "many" in the White House were

indicted for a number of crimes. No doubt! However, no one is leaking any

more information than that at this time.

That's a damn shame, too! Withholding that information from the

American voters seems itself to be an obstruction of justice. We voters not

only have a right to know, we also have the "need" to know -- and, before the

election. To not release the indictments is to be complaisant in allowing

known felons to be elected President and co-President of the United States.

If that is not a crime, it should be.

Then there is Al Gore, probably one of the stupidest men in

Washington. Hollywood has been working on Gore for nearly a year, doing their

best to make the White House fool publicly presentable. They did improve

him, but stupid still sneaks through anytime he is interviewed. He knows

the lines his coaches taught him, but little else.

Independent Prosecutor Kenneth Starr will be going after Gore next

year. Al Gore is involved in many of the illegal campaign contribution scams

currently in the news.

So, what will we have to look forward to if Clinton wins next week?

A lot of interesting legal action, that's what! In fact, if the Republicans

hold Congress, this action may get really hot and heavy. So much so, in

fact, that it could even blow the O.J. trial off of the newscasts. That, in

itself, will be a real blessing!

First, the new indictments will be announced. Hillary will get it

for sure, and many good legal minds in Washington believe Bill will also be

indicted. Bill Clinton will then pardon everyone involved. That leaves him

two choices: Resign the presidency, or wait to be impeached. He will

probably resign.

Two good legal minds in D.C. say that Clinton may be thinking of

declaring some type of national emergency. That would give him authority to

declare martial law before impeachment hearings can get started. That seems

a little far-fetched. But, if he did that before Congress can get started on

impeachment hearings, it could possibly work.

Under the war and emergency powers laws, he then becomes an American

dictator. Worse yet, by law, the emergency will not end until he personally

says it has ended. So, he could legally stay there forever.

Still, it sounds like these lawyers may have been drinking that

polluted D.C. water for too long. (Sorry guys.) Not even the Clintons would

do that.

Well? Would they?

When the Clintons leave, we get Al Gore as president. If we believe

his book, first on the Gore agenda will be an attack on our personal

automobiles. Al doesn't think we should have them. Automobiles pollute.

But wait! After the Clinton pardons, Kenneth Starr will have a lot

of free time on his hands. And he'll certainly have time to look into the

illegal campaign contribution and protection scheme the Clinton White House

ran for at least two years.

Say good by to Al Gore.

Next?

 

THE FBI AND RICHARD JEWELL

It is hard to believe that some Americans are surprised that the FBI

invented a bogus set of circumstances to apply for a search warrant on

Richard Jewell. This practice has been going on for years.

Consider the point of view of the FBI: Every agent's primary

responsibility is to make the Bureau look good publicly. There was a

bombing. People were hurt, and even killed by the bomb. The FBI was tasked

with finding the bomber. The Clinton Administration was putting pressure on

the FBI to get quick results. Richard Jewell was there, and almost fit one

of their silly profiles of a disgruntled citizen.

They needed a scapegoat to take the pressure off of the Bureau, so

they found one. They wrote a request for a search warrant based on very

dubious information. They presented it to a judge who would probably sign

a warrant for Mickey Mouse, if asked. Warrant in hand, the FBI went about

their business hassling Jewell -- and acting like they were solving a crime.

Evidence? Who needs evidence! The FBI, the judge and the prosecutor

all have immunity. They can make all of the "mistakes" they want. They can

incorrectly accuse anyone they wish. A citizen has no recourse.

Remember that. These are the cold hard facts of today's American

life. They have all of the power. If they want to come after you, under

the law, there is little or nothing you can do about it except to submit --

and hope the jury believes you when you are tried. Consequently, there are

only six words the average citizen need remember when speaking to an FBI

agent: "No comment," and "I want a lawyer."

Nothing will ever happen to anyone in law enforcement if they

wrongfully accuse. So, solely on the basis of rumor and innuendo, a search

warrant was obtained for Richard Jewell. No real facts or evidence of any

sort were necessary.

Worse yet, that all evidence the FBI found was exculpatory to Jewell

is also immaterial. They needed a body. They needed to show that they were

on top of the situation. Richard Jewell just happened to be available.

It should be no surprise to anyone that the expediency of federal law

enforcement supersedes the Constitutional rights of a citizen. That's the

way it has been for at least forty years. You see, folks, it is more

important for the FBI to look good publicly than for them to honor their

oath of office and protect the Constitutional rights of a citizen.

 

STONEING HISTORY

We all know the editorial liberties Oliver Stone took with his films

"Platoon," "JFK," and "Nixon." Now, American University in Washington, D.C.

offers "Oliver Stone: The Course" for credit. Stone will even be a guest

lecturer. That should dumb down the curriculum enough so today's high

school graduates can understand it.

"Oliver Stone has done more to shape popular attitudes toward U.S.

history than any filmmaker since John Ford," said Professor Peter Kuznick.

Get Real! Stone depicts American history his way. By rewriting it.

 

SUPPORTING THE TROOPS

Many of us still remember how the Clinton Administration put members

of our military in harms way in Somalia without proper back-up. That was the

type of situation that is inexcusable for the world's most powerful military

force. Americans died, simply because of the negligence and indifference of

those in the White House.

A new report describing the ambush of American Army personnel, and

the negligence of not sending adequate support, was just released on the

Internet. The web page address is: http://www.netcom.com/~noclue/ The

information is provided by Robert Wigod, who recently separated from the

Army.

Wigod requests your comments on the matter.

 

ASSAULTING LIBERTY

The Supreme Court recently let stand a precedent-setting ruling that

states may establish roadblocks for the chief purpose of intercepting illegal

drugs. This case of unreasonable searches and seizures developed because

Florida police stopped cars on the highway under the guise of drug

interdiction -- complete with drug-sniffing dogs to check the vehicles.

A federal district court judge was first to dismiss the lawsuit

brought by some of the motorists. The U.S. Court of Appeals in Atlanta also

agreed that this was not a violation of personal liberty. The appeals court

said the chief purpose of the operation was to intercept drugs, but ruled the

state also has the power to conduct roadblocks to check drivers' licenses

and vehicle registrations.

Evidently, the Fourth Amendment is now quite dead in that judicial

district of the United States. Citizens must now prove to proactive police

that they are not breaking the law. Truly, many federal judges need

retraining in the original intent of the United States Constitution. And/or,

they should be impeached as soon as possible.

To the Founding Fathers -- the authors of our Constitution -- the

word "Liberty" meant the right to move about and function in society as we

please. The only caveat being that we do not adversely affect the rights of

others in so doing. That meaning precedes the United States and is said to

be one of our inalienable rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution. No

judge has the right to redefine the meaning of Liberty, and we must tell

them so.

Reuters reported that the Supreme Court "sided with the state of

Florida, denying the appeal without any comment or dissent." Most probably,

the court was looking for a more definitive case to accept. Based on the

Wilson v. Arkansas search warrant opinion two years ago, it seems rather

unlikely the Supreme Court will allow this situation to continue for long.

Otherwise: Hello Police State!

 

PAID TO ATTEND SCHOOL

Did you know that your federal tax dollars are being spent to pay

Indian children to attend school? And no, it is not American Indian children

who are being paid. American tax dollars are paying children in India to go

to school.

Every year, the Clinton Administration is sending millions of our tax

dollars to pay children in India so they will not work, and instead can

attend school. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, that unabashed socialist

from Harvard, claims that paying school kids in India not to work somehow

benefits our American economy.

How long will it be before we pay their parents welfare too?

 

WORDS FROM A CLEAR THINKER

"Sadly, as a life-long Democrat and chief counsel of the House

Judiciary Committee at the time of the Nixon impeachment inquiry, I cannot

in good conscience vote to re-elect Bill Clinton. . . . Having long

championed traditional Democratic causes, I simply cannot accept Mr.

Clinton's shameless election year surge to the right as his chosen means of

winning a second term. And like most if not all traditional Democrats, I

have grave reservations about the Clintons' morality and ethics. In my view

there is now probable cause to consider our president and first lady as

felons, who are likely to be indicted after the Nov. 5 election."

-- Jerome M. Zeifman in the Wall Street Journal, 10/25/96

 

TELL THE LEFT WHAT YOU THINK

ABC Good Morning America -- gma@abc.com

ABC Nightline -- NTline@aol.com

ABC Primetime Live -- PTLive@aol.com

CBS News producer -- dcp@cbsnews.com

Fox News -- foxnet@delphi.com

NBC Dateline -- dateline@news.nbc.com

NBC Meet the Press -- mtp@news.nbc.com

NBC Nightly News -- nightly@news.nbc.com

NBC Today Show -- today@news.nbc.com

Tom Snyder Late Late Show -- latelateshow@cbs.com